Press "Enter" to skip to content

A good quote -in my poor understand

The quote is from Charles Tilly (and if you don’t know who Tilly would be good what to find out, the guy is very interesting). But let’s start with the quote:

‘Those attractions [find variations] have, unhappily, tempted social scientists into some oftheir greatest technical abuse. There is the abuse of the Great Blender, in which we take numerical observationson a hundred-odd national states, made comparable by the magic fact of appearing in parallel columns of a statistical handbook, and run multiple regressions or factor analysis in order to discern the dimensions of development, modernity, of political instability, or of someother equally ill-defined global concept. There is the abuse of the Ersatz Laboratory, in which surveys teams establish themselves in a number of different countries, translate to the common questionnaire into the various local languages, send out interviewers to ask the questions of presumably comparable samples of individuals or households in each country, code up their results into standard categories, then pool the information thus manufactured into an analysis of cross-cultural variation in the relationship between X And y, with Z controlled. Let us not forget the abuse of the Cultural this program, in which hired graduate students read stacks of ethnographic articles and monographs, recording for each ‘society’ encountered the presence or abscence of patrilocal residence, early weaning, male puberty rituals, couvade, and dozens of other cultural traits, then transform their judgments into holes in Hollerith cards, so that someone else can run statistical analysis to determine either which ‘societies’ resemble each other most, or which cultural traits vary together’ (p 116-117 of Big structures, large processes, huge comparisons, Russel Sage, 1984).

It is not that Tilly says that the quantitative studies compared not serve (in fact mentions the utility of the studies standardized on the time), but the naivety many times from them and all the things you forget (for example -and this is not the only thing- ‘they treat many units whose independence with respect to the characteristics being measured is uncertain, for example, Belgium, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, the German Federal Republic, Switzerland, France and Liechtenstein appear as separate cases in an analysis of the relationship between television viewing and newspaper readership’ (p 118).

In the end, a good quote from a good book.